From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Subject: FZ Bible Level 4 Tapes 03/12
Date: 12 Nov 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <882592aa1c988ab1484b88bf2619d1c1@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to <squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
LEVEL 4 ACADEMY TAPES 03/12

**************************************************

ACADEMY LEVEL 4 TAPES - Contents

SHSBC = St. Hill Special Briefing Course
ren = as renumbered in the new BC cassettes.

01 SHSBC-299  ren 328 27 Aug 63 Rightness and Wrongness
02 SHSBC-300  ren 329 28 Aug 63 The Tone Arm And The Service Facsimile
03 SHSBC-301  ren 330 29 Aug 63 The Service Facsimile
04 SHSBC-302a ren 331  3 Sep 63 R3SC
05 SHSBC-302  ren 332  4 Sep 63 How to Find a Service Facsimile
06 SHSBC-303  ren 333  5 Sep 63 Service Fac Assessment
07 SHSBC-304  ren 334 10 Sep 63 Destimulation of a Case
08 SHSBC-306  ren 335 11 Sep 63 Service Facs and GPMs
09 SHSBC-305  ren 336 12 Sep 63 Service Facsimiles
10 SHSBC-307  ren 337 17 Sep 63 What You Are Auditing
11 SHSBC-308  ren 338 18 Sep 63 Saint Hill Service Facsimile Handling
12 SH Spec-73 ren 436  2 Aug 66 Suppressives and GAEs

Many but not all were checked against the old reels (as noted
on the individual transcripts.)

**************************************************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoners are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heretics.  By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judaism form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************

SHSBC-301 ren 330 29 Aug 63 The Service Facsimile

THE SERVICE FACSIMILE

A lecture given on 29 August 1963

[Based on the Clearsound version only.]


Thank you. Well, let's pick it up where we left it. What is
the date? 

Audience: August 29th. August 29, AD 13.

Okay. Today I want to talk to you about service facsimiles.
And this has a great deal to do with overrestimulation, the
tone arm, the itsa line, all of this is a very neat
package. And if you absorbed all of its various angles and
all of its ramifications, boy, will you be able to audit! Wow!

Now,we've covered everything, actually. We've covered the
itsa line and we've covered charge and restimulation, and
we've covered all these various factors. And the last
challenging statement I left you with was something on this
order - was, if you couldn't make a free needle Clear in a
twenty-five hour intensive using Prepchecks, then you must
be dealing with a rightness-wrongness computation. Must be
dealing with that computation, see? One of the data on this
is the fact that if a Prepcheck turns on mass, you've got
it. Your pc is sitting right on a service fac on that
Prepcheck subject.

Now, when we say a service fac, we are dealing with old
Advanced Procedures and Axioms, and actually we are adding
to the definition an understanding of something we have had
for a long time. So there isn't any good sitting back and
yawning and say, "Well, I know all about service
facsimiles," because I'11 let you in on something: I knew
they existed, but I myself did not know all about them.
There was more to be known about a service facsimile.

It's what the individual uses,  according to the early
definitions, to explain his condition. That's according to
the early definition. What he uses to explain his condition
or get his way in the world, and so forth. There was
ramifications to uses. That was why it was called a service
facsimile, because it was of service to him.

Now, let's extend this a little bit and understand exactly
what this thing is. Because with that definition which you
have just been given, it did not promptly surrender. You
notice nothing in that definition gives you an open sesame
to - how to attack this thing. How can you do anything with it?

Yes, we know this is true, but that is the end of it. So
this guy has a service facsimile, of a bent head, you see?
All right, what does he do with it? What does he do with
this? Well, he makes - he explains how he is not getting
along in life and explains all of his failures with it, and
so forth, and we know this about this bent head, but you 
notice that doesn't resolve any bent head.

Now, a new factor swings in on top of this and we also had
the O/W mechanism and that might have ticked some corner of
the service facsimile, hut they didn't seem to he too
closely associated. But in actual fact, the service
facsimile manifestation is a blood brother to O/W. A blood
brother. Because it's how you make people guilty.

Now, a better understanding - a better understanding of
this - many pieces of which we've already had and I'm sure,
thought about, opens the door wide open to cracking a case. 
So it took just this little bit more understanding. And that 
is, just this definition of a service facsimile: It is that 
condition which the individual uses to make himself right 
and others wrong. And the second we have defined a service 
facsimile as any condition or state which an individual uses 
to make himself right and others wrong, the second that we 
have done that, we open the door to a resolution of cases.

It's terribly, terribly true. The only thing which blocks
the door from opening all the way, is the fact that the
line has been booby-trapped in GPMs with rightness and
wrongness GPMs. There's "to be right"; there's the
right-wrong dichotomies in GPMs; there's - these things 
are to be found on the track, and by using rightness and
wrongness, we are liable to get the individual into them,
particularly if we do not use a time factor. But the use of
a time factor obviates much of that.

An individual has not had a GPM in this lifetime, so we
say, "In this lifetime., how have you been right or how
has doing something or other made you right?" (Anybody got
a fly swatter?) We say, "In this lifetime, how has eating
canned heat made you right? And how has it made others
wrong in this lifetime?" Don't you see? And you've kept the
guy from going scintillatingly backtrack. Now, in actual
fact, you're dealing with sufficient power here in
sufficient magnitude, that you can whip somebody on the
backtrack and restimulate more than you can pick up in a
long day of Sundays, if you run it with complete wild
abandon. Just like you let an itsa line wander around on
the backtrack, you're filling up the restimulation
chamber - the - so fast that there aren't enough petcocks on
it, and the seams go creeeak and the pc looks like he's
going to explode.

In other words, you can kick up charge with this. All you
have to do is get the pc into the GPM of rightness and
wrongness and then not run the GPM and zzzuh. Actually the
GPM has only partially aberrated this thing. In other
words, it's not the reason for it. The GPM of rightness and
wrongness, a goal to be wrong or the goal to be right or
something like that, actually are not the reason for this
situation. We're dealing now with an upperscale rationale.

Now the remaining parts of this rationale will be of great
interest to you. There's survival. Now, once in awhile you
run into the goal "survive." You run into this once in a
while. There's one about - the fifth galaxy over here, they
start their Darwinian implant, and so forth, with "to
persist." And you wonder where's the rest of the GPM. Well,
the trick is there isn't any, and it isn't - hasn't even got
an opposite side. It simply sits there as one lonely item
at the beginning of the implant, "to persist." There's - not
very often on the track do you find this idea. But it's
mostly couched in the lines of "persist," or something like
that. And frankly, at this moment, I do not know of a
single GPM that contains the word "survive" - at this
moment. I'm prepared to be wrong and find one. But I don't
know of one. Which is quite interesting, as you look at it 
there on Dianetics - you had expected Dianetics to be mostly 
dramatization and things off the whole track and that sort 
of thing. The funny part of it is, it rather miraculously 
escapes these at all angles. And "to survive" apparently 
does. Of course, I'm at any moment prepared to find one. 
But apparently this concept was not motivated by some
bank mechanism.

"Survive," you'll find, except for "to persist," or
something like that - you'll find is a relatively free
highway. You can use "survive" in processing rather easily.
Now it is the top scale of all of this. By the way, "live"
and "alive" and other things like that, man, that'd - heh!
Hah-hah-hah-hah-hah the implanters never missed those, you
know, "That's the trouble with you people, you are alive,
you know! Oh, we got to do something about that!" Sound
like the American Medical Association, you know. "An
operation a day keeps the doctor wealthy!" "You might not
feel good, but we can buy better Cadillacs!" You know? That
kind of approach. I don't - didn't mean to make a snide
remark. We should actually bow our heads and - in a moment
of silent prayer over the poor AMA. Do you realize that the
major insurance companies now have all of their money on
the fact that the AMA will cease to exist, as a powerful
entity, within five years. Why? Because they're going to be
socialized. Socialized medicine is the chip on which the
big insurance company has put its money in the United
States and of course that finishes the AMA.

The AMA is only there to keep the doctor wealthy and the
moment the doctor is expropriated, the way these foreign
governments are always taking over your assets, you know,
well, the doctor gets expropriated within five years. Our
strategy on this is very sound. All we have to do is hold
the fort, keep ourselves in good shape, keep our Technical
alive, keep the gun cocked and within five years there's no
opposition. It will have been taken out by another of our
worst enemies. I think it's marvelous! All we've got to do
is hang on, hang on politely and sweetly, and so forth,
over in the corner of the ring, not getting in the road of
too many blows, and there's two fighters out there in the
ring right now, cutting each others' eyes open, and
bloodying each others' noses, and so forth, because
"Democracy is going to bring medicine to the people."
Democratic governments have insisted that this is their
right - to bring medicine to the people. We're not quite
sure why, but they're going to bring medicine to the
people. That's democracy.

And on the other side of the fence, the medical doctor has
decided that he is not going to be part of the government.
And he lost that fight in Britain here a number of years
ago. And actually, you go up and you kick the British
Medical Association and push it and turn it over, look at
its face, pry open its eyelids, turn it back over on its
face again - it's dead, it's dead all right, but somebody
forgot to bury it. And the only overt action it's taken
against Scientology, as far as I know, is an occasional
letter to somebody who asked them about Scientology or
something like that and he says we're a bunch of quacks
that hang out in Brighten. I think that's their public line
on this.

And that's very interesting, because we don't use
quicksilver. You say, what has that got to do with it?
That's the meaning of the word "quack." It is one who cures
with quicksilver. You used to see them around the county
fairs of England all the time, with bichloride mercury, and
they cured things with mercury and very often poisoned
people, and so on, and had a bad time in general, and from
"quick" came the word "quack." And that is what a quack is,
it is one who uses quicksilver. And you probably could win
a suit against the AMA right this minute, by saying,
proving conclusively that we do not use quicksilver! They 
tried to broaden the definition of this old English term. 
And of course, it is still itself and has no other genus.

All right, so much for that. The point we're making here,
is that we have a wide open road, all along the line, here,
for clearing, and with clearing goes healing. The line is
opening up to such a degree, that I would suspect that the
HPA/HCA of tomorrow practiced a great deal of healing. In
the past, as we realize, we have not really wanted anybody
to go in for healing. I've told you many times it is
nonsense to go in for healing, and I'm sure you've heard
me. The world of healing, however - it was not something
that we couldn't do something about, we were actually being
polite and courteous, and so forth, and didn't try to
invade that particular sphere. And we didn't get paid for
it. And they kept saying, "Why are you healing people?" And
we didn't heal people and they'd say, "You dogs, you're
healing people!" And so forth. And one court in Virginia
they proved conclusively that Scientology was a healing
science, because it cured things, and actually brought
people into court to show that they had been cured of
something by Scientology, which proved it was a healing
science, and gave some - and I don't even think though they
had the nerve to call the auditor in and sentence him. I
think he remains unsentenced to this day. It was just too
much nonsense, you see.

In other words, they can go clear around the line. That
proves we're a healing subject, you see. Wild business.
Look the length and breadth of the land, I don't think they
could have found anybody who'd been healed by anything on
medicine. But they were proving our cases for us. I think
it's marvelous! But anyway, that restriction will be over.
You today could heal in England. And as far as Australia is
concerned, Australia is very closely associated with the
United States with regard to its attitude toward medicine.
And the Australian medical pattern is patterned directly
after the AMA. But there is a great deal of pressure on, in
Australia, to socialize medicine in Australia and I think
that the next orders to Australia will be, "Put all
possible pressure behind socialization of medicine by the
government." Because it apparently totally paralyzes
medical activities. It's the greatest way to have no
medicine that anybody ever invented.

"Socialized medicine is good for you!" You just get
a - because there isn't any healing involved with it.
Doctors are supposed to have a certain number of patients
and if they get a large number of patients then they draw
certain fees and they can't draw any more fees than that
and that's the end of that. And then they don't have to see
the patients in order to draw any fee, so they don't have
to work, so who cares?

You'll find, however, they're quite eager beaverish and do
try to drum up a practice out beyond their socialized
practice here in medicine. And you'll find out this
is - they're quite active in this particular sphere.

Now these boys - these boys have a tough line and with their
existing technology won't make it. Because there's always
the plumbing trade. The broken leg has to be put back
together again. The bits and pieces that get strewn over
the highway have to be reassembled. There's always the
carpentry side of healing. It's a sort of an artisan
activity. Somebody's - gets a fractured skull and that sort
of thing and the bits of bone are around, and so on - well
there's always... They used to use barbers to do it and so
on, and well, the barber sign today just shows, "We bleed
people." Why don't you startle some barber someday when
you'go in and say, "All right, bleed me!" Because the
barber pole twisting around is a trickle of blood running
into a basin and that's why that barber pole is striped
that way. Phlebotomy was done by barbers.

Now, the medical doctor is straight up against it. Because
the moment he comes out of the plumbing trade, he runs
square in to the mechanics of the mind. He believes that
structure monitors function. He believes this. He's hung
with this one. If you ever want to argue with a doctor and
get him going in circles, start proving to him that
function monitors structure or thought monitors structure.
If a guy doesn't want to walk, he isn't going to. You can
do a lot, but somehow or other he'll always manage to fall
down and not walk. No matter what you do. No matter what
you do, medically. Now, you can go into the plumbing trade
all you want to and still nothing happens, you see? These
guys are up against this all the time. And when they get
away from setting the broken bone and patching up the face
and putting a new piece of skin on Mrs. Gotbucks' nose and
re-forming the ears and physical features of criminal B,
and when they get off these various points of purely
mechanical handling of matter, they're lost.

Nobody on this planet knew anything about it till we came
along. They had ideas. Psychology merely had the idea that
it didn't do any good to cure anybody. Not only would
nobody ever change, but it didn't do any good to try to
cure anybody, because if you cured them of anything, they
would get something else. And the psychologist has already 
commented upon that and so has more or less abandoned cure.

The medical doctor is infuriated by the use of the word
"cure," so is the psychologist, so is the psychiatrist.
They do not want to have anything to do with this word
"cure." In fact there are twenty-five diseases in the state
of California - I'm sure there are more than twenty-five
diseases in the state of California - but there are
twenty-five diseases out there which it is illegal to try
to cure. If you say that you are trying to cure them or say
that anything could cure them, you could be promptly
arrested and slapped in the clink. This is how convinced
they are that a cure is impossible.

However, twenty-two and a half percent of all the cases
which come in front of you, you shouldn't be proud of.
Twenty-two and a half percent of your pcs should cause you
no vast feeling of pride, if they suddenly grow wings and
get well. Because that's the expected percentage. If you
fed them flour-and-water pills, if you patted them on the
back, if you tapped them on the shoulder lightly and said,
"Your name is skunk," it wouldn't matter - they would get
well of whatever they have. This is this suggestion group.
There's over twenty-two and a half percent or twenty-two
and a half percent of the people of this planet are
apparently in a constant hypnotic state. So almost anytime
you tell them they're well, they're susceptible to becoming
well. That doesn't keep them from getting sick tomorrow.
That's something that you should realize. If a healing
profession does not get more than twenty-two and a half
percent, it is not doing anything. And if it gets less than
twenty-two and a half percent cure, it is impeding it. Your
expected figure, then, is twenty-two and a half percent. If
you do a perfectly dreadful job and sock them on the head
and depress their morale and kick them around and all of
this sort of thing, why, you will get less than your
twenty-two and a half percent. If you do something for
them, you will get more than twenty-two and a half percent.
That figure is going to stay there anyhow. If you're a
healer, you'll get that many people getting well. Which is
quite interesting to you.

I don't know what our figure is up to.  I am unutterably cocky 
about this kind of thing. I myself have healed so many things, 
accidentally and otherwise and on purpose and not for pay,
that it was quite obvious that wierd things would happen if 
a Scientologist was ever turned loose in the healing
professions. Healing something is relatively easy with
Scientology. But the only thing which cuts your percentage
back now - there are two things - is you can't get in
communication with the person - already dead, or
something - in a coma or already dead and you can't get in
communication with him at all. See, you understand, that
would cut you back. And the other one, is the service fac.
That's the other one that'll get in your road.

Now. if we allow now, in our technolaey, for the fact that
as far as present lifetime techniques are concerned, it 
takes a relatively short period of time to train an auditor
into them, and don't worry about making an auditor who
can make an OT - let's just keep him along in that other 
level - he doesn't have to be a super, super, super expert 
to do a Prepcheck on this lifetime, let me assure you! You 
consider that amongst your more banal toss-away tools, you 
see. And if you turn somebody loose with an understanding 
of the service facsimile, an understanding of a repetitive 
process, an understanding of the itsa line, limited him to 
this lifetime, let him rely on the tone arm of the meter, 
there he'd be! He'd be practically sweeping the boards, as 
far as illness is concerned.

Now it's all right to say somebody has a bad back because
they have a facsimile. Got an incident or an engram. All
right. Now that's all right. But that's too short a look at
the situation. In the first place, the facsimile has to
have been restimulated for the person to have had a bad
back. Just the possession of a facsimile that can deliver a
bad back - if that guaranteed that you would have a bad
back - and this is, of course, the one thing that the healer
of the past has never been able to sort out. This guy - one
guy has an experience of some kind or another and gets
well, another guy has the same experience and he doesn't
get well and therefore it's all random. See? Now, the truth
of the matter is that having an experience which is liable
to give you a bad back, is not a guarantee that you will
have a bad back. That's no guarantee at all. Another factor
has to enter in: Something has to restimulate that
experience. Something has to bring it into being, kick it
in and actually, to give you a real bad back, hold it in.
You have to have a continuing restimulation of this thing
to have a real bad back.

And that comes under the heading of restimulation. So not
only do you have to have the incident - see, unrestimulated,
this incident is going to be nothing - you also have to have
a restimulation of the incident, in order to bring about a
bad back. And that restimulation to keep the back bad, for
a long period of time, has to be constantly restimulated.
Constantly. For instance, part of the incident that's being
restimulated is a girl with green eyes. And the guy marries
a girl with green eyes. He's had it! Bad back!

All right. You get the mechanism by which a psychosomatic
illness can occur. Now, add to that a mental aberration.
Oh, there isn't one of you that doesn't have a beautifully
polished, wonderfully grooved in, perfectly administered,
by the best medical - I beg your pardon - by the best
implanting agencies, some goal, like "to be insane." Well,
why aren't you all crazy?

I ran by one the other day, I'm afraid I wasn't even
interested in it. It didn't go into restimulation. Wasn't
anything there. It just didn't appeal to me, somehow or
another. Wasn't anything I was afraid of and it wasn't
anything I was going to attack and it wasn't anything this
way and it wasn't anything that way. It was likely to
remain quiet for a long time, don't you see?

Well, the combination of circumstances and so forth didn't
include that particular one into the lineup - well, it
just - it isn't even the accident of restimulation. It's
what the individual feels might become restimulated. What
he himself opposes. What he becomes afraid of when it is
restimulated. Because to all'this mechanical activity,
which viewpoint we have gratuitously inherited from the
Aesculapians, from all of the ancient schools of healing.
Just that it's just going to be a mechanical fact, see.
They're so used to dealing with the broken leg, that they
say, you hit a leg it breaks, when you set it it heals,
see. They love life to be in that mechanical action. To
that we have actually added the individual. Now this is
something new and strange. This is something that is
unheard of. Now, the medico says, well, some people want to
get well and some people don't want to get well, and sort
of dismisses it. He hopes. If he ever enters into that
field at all.

Did you ever stop and think that the experiential pattern
of a being might itself make up an aberration? Regardless
of the incident. Now, we see, we're above the level of
Scientology Two, Three. This guy has lived all of his life
in the vicinity of very cold winds, storms, situations - 
cold. All of his life. Cold. He eventually gets a certain 
amount of knowingness on the subject of cold. He eventually 
learns how to take care of himself on the subject of cold. 
So one fine night you throw him out into the middle of the 
forty-below cold snow storm. Well, one of two things will 
happen. He either has somehow or another maintained his 
confidence in his ability to handle himself with regard 
to cold or that confidence has vanished with regard to it 
and he is afraid of being cold. So at the point we throw 
him out, he either freezes to death or lives. See, even 
though we've had a lifetime of Pavlovian slavering -
excuse me, conditioning - even though he has had a lifetime 
of this conditioning, a lifetime of conditioned reflexes, 
of familiarization and so forth, we can't count, at the 
final end of this line, whether or not he has learned to 
be afraid of what he is conditioned on or has become 
confident because of what he is conditioned on.

These factors have a lot to do with the individual. How he
looks at something. You can take the same engram.
Identically the same engram in A, in B, and C. You may get
something on the order of, A will be terrified of it and
fight it and try to get away from it and want nothing to do
with it whatsoever. B won't even look at it, just skips it.
And C says, "Oh! Phooph!" And that's the end of it. Now
what makes the difference between these three reactions?
What makes that difference? And we curve right on back to
the service facsimile.

How many ways, off hand, could you use a facsimile to be
right and make others wrong? How many ways? Now this guy
who is terrified of this facsimile, ha, ha! Obviously lying
in back of this thing you're liable to get lots of ways to
be right by having this facsimile and make others wrong by
having this facsimile. This guy B, who doesn't have any
reaction to it at all and just skips it, doesn't have any
use for it at all. Either to make himself right or to make
others wrong. And this guy C, who just goes "Phooph," has
got another method of making others wrong: By being
competent, with regard to this type of facsimile.

See the ramifications of it? There's only one of these
three, then, that has no vested interest whatsoever in the
rightness and wrongness of the situation. So that is always
present, in any bank, in any pc, any place, it is always
present that you have the rightness-wrongness possibility.
Every person is slightly liable to this - greater or lesser
degrees in one field or another field. Everyone is liable
to this. Of the using certain kinds of injuries. Using
certain kinds of actions. Using certain kinds of
disabilities. Using certain kinds of inabilities. To make
himself right, and make others wrong.

So this is not a selected thing, which simply goes home to
one, two or three people. Now,to the healer - to the healer,
this represents a very heavy barrier. Because a guy who is
using ulcers to make himself right and make somebody else
wrong, is not going to get well from the ulcers. Man, you
can feed him full of barium meal. You can cut off his
cigarettes. You can prescribe all kinds of things. You can
put various type of amino acids in his diet. You can beef
him up with types of refortification of his blood sugar or
sovwaa! You know? And the guy will still go on having ulcers!

Sometimes if you're really good and he isn't watching, you
get to him. See? You get to him sometimes. Even though he
does have a rightness-wrongness possibility, so the
occasional random cure among the rightness-wrongness things
tends to set it aside as being the reason why, you see. He
just wasn't looking. You know, he kept taking the amino
acids and kept taking the amino acids, and by God, one
morning he woke and he didn't have ulcers. I bet it worried
him sick! Did, too! Very shortly after he has nightsweats.

Why? Well, you've taken away from him, you've taken away
from him his rightness-wrongness service facsimile. It's
the most constant use. So what's he got to do now? He's got
to get another one.

Now I told you something the other day, that wasn't quite
accidentally. I gave you a joke and you might have taken it
as something that was something else. I said the guy who
was picking bugs off of himself - I was telling you not to
worry about getting them on you. That was the joke. In
actual fact, if you were to sit there and pick bugs off
yourself, you'd establish a communication line with the
guy. That's perfectly valid! And will furnish you enough
cures of such characters as to establish you a considerable
reputation! This bird's sitting there - you sit there and
you go... All of a sudden the guy'll look at you and he'll
stop doing it. He's somehow or another communicated it to
somebody. He may take it as an itsa line. He also might
take it as a mockery, he might also take it as an insult,
he might take it a lot of other ways, but enough times you
will have gotten through to him that you could at least
talk to him.

So it's quite valid to mimic in that particular line. That
has a very low level of application in the field of
psychotherapy. Now it's interesting, it's interesting. But
a certain number of those cases will stop picking bugs off
themselves and promptly look for snakes in inkwells. So you
look for snakes in inkwells and they'll stop looking for
snakes in inkwells, don't you see, and start looking for
police in wastepaper baskets. And this goes ad nauseam. Now
the second you would not have established the first
communication line and the person would have done something
else, you must recognize then, that the person has a vested
rightness-wrongness interest in picking bugs off
themselves. Insanity or craziness dr distraction is a
service facsimile. Aberrated behavior is a service facsimile.

Well, now, that blocks the line to more hopes of curing
things than you could count. Because you can't ever
apparently, if you didn't know about a service facsimile,
you could never get a hundred percent series on any
technique. Let's take a hundred patients and you're going
to cure up and up along the line, and all of a sudden you
have there thirty or forty of these characters standing
there looking at you jut-jawed, not cured. Your first
response to this sort of thing would be, "Well, that
technique did not work." The wrong answer might be to find
another technique. Of course it's also possible the
technique didn't work, see? There's always your random factors.

Was it because the technique wasn't working? Or was it
because those thirty or forty people had service facsimiles?

Now, if the technique is good, good enough, for God's
sakes, to work on sixty or seventy of those people...! Look
at how far that is above that twenty-two and a half! Look
how far that is! This is how you evaluate techniques and
processes, by the way, you should have some knowledge of
that. Look, my God, you cured sixty or seventy out of that
hundred! What were you entitled to? You were entitled to
22.5. I don't know what you would do with a half-cured
bloke, but there you are! Your statistics, then, are well
in excess of the required 22.5 percent.

So actually, recognizing that, you would - should look
elsewhere. You should look around elsewhere to find what
happened to this thirty or forty. What happened to them?
How come? And what you would find, if you investigated it
very carefully is, being the way they were, made them
right, and being the way they were or that type of
were-ness, made another or others wrong. That computation
sits there surrounding that service facsimile.

Now, this is apt to keep a lot of research workers running
on a mad treadmill. Trying to find something that gets the
hundred percent. And paying no attention whatsoever to the
fact there might be something different.

Let me give you the difference of research. The medico sets
up a series - he sets up usually a series of two, series of
one. That's right. You read their papers when they have
conferences, you'd be amazed the biggest series they'll
show. "It is incontrovertibly proven, that nitroglycerin is
the very, very best thing to fix up bunions. On three
consecutive cases with bunions, chosen at random, over a
period of eight years, putting nitroglycerin capsules
between the toes ..." and do you know this is good enough
to cause Parke and Davis and Lilly and the big drug
companies and all these blokes of one kind or another to
immediately turn out eighteen billion pills, sold at a vast
figure, at a vast profit. Particularly to the AMA which
apparently owns the major stock in the drug companies. And
the FDA, of course, which somehow or another always seems
to come out tops when they pass a drug. And it was a series
of three.

Quite interesting. This is very careless research on which
modern medicine is built. Very careless. Series of one,
series of two, series of three. They'll pass a whole
operation on the basis that three people survived it.
That's not good enough. That's not good enough research
statistics. Because of what? Well, I don't know, maybe they
were - you haven't outlawed the twenty-two and a half
percent, don't you see. What'd you have? What'd you have?
Three volunteers? Well, how do you know these three
volunteers weren't part of the twenty-two and a half
percent, and would have gotten well whether you'd done
anything with them or not? How do you know that?

So it requires a long enough series to get around that
factor. And when you're demonstrating whether techniques
work or not, it's a series that has to be longer, than - so
you can isolate the twenty-two and a half percent. Because
the more people you use, the less likely it is that they
are members of the twenty-two and a half percent, don't you
see? You got to outlaw that accidental fact, and we've very
definitely outlawed it over a period of years, we've
outlawed it and gone upstairs - I don't know how many cases
have responded along in this particular line.

But it wasn't important to us, because we had no way to
test whether or not the case was or wasn't. And the way
this problem got its back broken might interest you. The
tone arm. The tone arm turned out to be a very reliable 
measure of case progress. The tone arm's a measure of 
case progress. A consistent and continual, to get effort, 
to get results, here, there and elsewhere, on cases
meant that you had to get tone arm action on those cases,
and it was very carefully watched what was getting tone arm
action on these cases and the negative result was the first
one that turned up. The negative result. If you don't get
tone arm action on a case, restimulation is the only thing
that occurs from auditing.

That's a horrifying figure, you see, restimulation,
destimulation or discharge. Those are the three things 
that are possible under auditing. And if there's no
destimulation, of course, there's no tone arm action. If
there's no discharge, there's no tone arm action. So when
you get no tone arm action, you have restimulation. That's
all you've got left. Because something is going to occur in
auditing. Why? Because the auditor is busy, the pc is
busy - they're trying to do something.

That's the negative look. That's the negative look at this
situation. No tone arm action, you're going to get
restimulation. You audit without tone arm action and you'll
worsen the pc. About three sessions, he's had it. Three
sessions without tone arm action, and he will become one of
the saddest characters you wanted to see for a long time.
The margin is only about three sessions. At the end of the
third session, he feels horrible. Don't ask me how he feels
at the end of the eighth. Because it would be proportionately 
greater, because there's more and more restimulation 
occurring here.

It is overrestimulation which brings about the acute amount
of discomfort that the pc ordinarily claims about. If a pc
is being upset about auditing in any way, if the pc's life
is not running smoothly, if the pc's ability to handle
things is bad off, and so forth, that all slots in to the
one slot, of overrestimulation. That covers the lot. You
don't have to worry about whether or not he's got GPMs in
restimulation or engrams. You don't have to worry about
whether or not he's got ARC breaks in restimulation with
the auditor. We don't have to worry about anything except
that. We know overrestimulation has and is occurring.

Which means more has been restimulated by life and auditing
than is being discharged in the auditing session. All
right, that was the first thing learned. And that's a very,
very important datum. It's idiotically simple this datum,
anybody can get ahold of that one. That's easy.

What about the additional data? What happens with medium
tone arm action? Which is to say, something that would add
up to, well, something that would add up to fifteen to
twenty divisions of tone arm action at session ends, of
down tone arm. Quantitative, see? Supposing you took every
single little twitch of the tone arm that occurred in the
session. Every twitch down. Of course, it's got to come
back up too. But let's just take every twitch down, that it
makes, during the whole session. And let's carefully mark
those down in fractions of a division - no matter how tiny
they are, don't you see? Let's mark every one down. At the
end of the session let's add all those up.

Good tone arm action, or excellent tone arm action, would
be up around thirty. Somewhere upstairs like that. Around
thirty. Acceptable tone arm action will be around fifteen
to twenty. And below that point, more restimulation is
occurring than discharge. Oooh! That's a lot more tone arm
action than you thought, wasn't it? Ugh! Horrible! My God,
what are you doing to your pc? Hey, I better watch that.
Stop worrying about it. You'd be surprised how rapidly
fifteen to twenty divisions of action stack up, even when
your pc is only getting little quarter of a division
blowdowns. And if you want to really know, just pull that 
mathematical trick on the pc. The figures, actually, I've 
given you are just approximate. The estimation of how much 
is good, excellent, and so forth. That's just approximation. 
We'll know more about this when we measure more pcs.

But that gives you how much tone arm action there was in
the session. It isn't really how much per twenty
minutes - that gives you a small amount. But actually if you
wanted to know how much there should be in the twenty
minutes you should add up all of the moments - movements
down during the twenty minutes and get that final figure.
And little blowdowns of .2, little .2 blowdowns, well, .2, 
2, .2, .2,.2, well look, we got a division! You'd be 
surprised how fast these things add up.

But there is a point where an apparency of tone arm motion
exists, when in actual fact only restimulation is
occurring. And that's - you work on the: guy and you work on
the guy and it's stuck, see, oh boy, it's really there,
it's right there, 4.75, you see. And you work on him and
you work on him and you work on him and you work on him and
you work on him and you assess and you assess and you
assess and you talk to him and you work on him and you work
on him and finally he finds the little lock and you get
your tone arm blowdown! Hah Finally! I got all of that tone
arm blowdown!

Well, in actual fact it was 1.75 divisions. And it starts
going back upstairs again and it goes back upstairs again
and it goes back upstairs again and you work on him and you
work on him and you work on him and down toward the end of
the session, somewhere down toward the end of the session,
you get this tremendous blowdown from 4.5 to 3.75.

Well, that's 1.75 plus .75 and that's the total shift of
the tone arm for a session. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh! How
does that - how does that agree, see, with this other figure
I just gave you? Well, it doesn't at all. It's a dangerous
amount. In other words, it's just sitting there. Of course
the one I'm talking about, a motionless tone arm, that just
sits at 5.0, at 5.0, at 5.0, at 5.0, at 5.0, for three
sessions, your pc is darn near going to blow his brains
out, man!

But you see, this was apparent - you did get a couple of
motions of the tone arm during the session. So you say,
"Oh, well, yes, there was tone armtone arm motion in the
session!" No, there wasn't tone arm motion in the session!
Not enough to worry about, see. It was just 1.75 plus .75
and that was the totality of the whole session. Look, you
restimulated more than that. Just making him look at his
bank, you restimulated more than that. That's for sure!

You're - sure enough, you're going to find at the next
session he doesn't sit at 4.75, but sits at 5.0. It's gone
up .25. More heavily charged. Now, we're going to have
less - less ease of getting those blowdowns. When we get
this blowdown, it's .2. Heh! And we get two .2 blowdowns in
two and a half hours of auditing. Hmmmm Now! Next time he
comes into session, we've got it at 5.25 - it's sitting next
time he comes into session. And we audit him that whole
session and we don't get any blowdowns at all. And tone arm
doesn't move at all. Now, if you went on another session,
after this, that needle's going to start sticking and if
you carried on a couple of more sessions after this, this
thing is going to go through 7.0, backwards. And you're
going to have a low-tone-arm stuck-needle case. Now, if you
carried on with this nonsense any further, you'd have a
dead thetan. Tight stuck needle, pc at Clear read, going no
place.

All this was very important data. Very, very, very important 
data. If that kind of thing can happen to the pc, we'd 
certainly better know all there is to know about a tone arm 
action and behavior. Well, one of the things of course that 
I went into and found out - I didn't so much go into this. 
Mary Sue got the idea that she would - kept somebody adding 
up all the little blowdowns, all the little blowdowns, all 
the little blowdawns, any kind of motion, and so forth, and 
I think she wound up with what? Thirty...? 

Female voice: Thirty-seven, that's up and down.

Thirty-seven, up and down, which made an aggregate of
something on the order of about eighteen and a half down.
And that tone arm, during the whole session, never moved
more than about .25 divisions. But it did it so frequently,
you see. It did it so often, and actively. And that's what
made the difference.

So, it is the total amount of blowdown, during the entirety
of the session, all added together, that gives you what you
call tone arm action. Now, I'm going to get a little
pedometer one of these days, if I possibly can, every time
you move the tone arm down, it cranks a little speedometer
up at the top of the meter. Now, I don't know who the devil
will ever make this or when it'll ever come out. But that
is the - that's the ne plus ultra, see? And you mark down on
your report that the pc got that many tone arm divisions.

Only in that way would we know with great accuracy what is
tone arm motion. See, and then we could carry it out and
finish off the whole thing, as a thing, and we could give
it to the decimal. And we'd say this exact figure. When you
don't get as much as that... Watch it, see? And if you get
more than that, why fair, if you get more than that, that's
good. And this is an adequate discharge to permit us to run
whole track. And then we'd set the auditor up that he's got
to clock off - he's got to clock off, pretty regularly, with
routine processes, he's got to clock off enough TA action
to permit him to run the whole track. And then of course,
somebody's going to free the needle and get none, by
Prepchecking, and then, of course, never be able to go
whole track because he hasn't got enough tone arm
action - ya-ya, I'm sorry! That's a - I'm getting cynical,
you're making me cynical, you realize that?

Now, that's - you got to have a certain amount of tone arm
action in order to say that discharge is taking place and
that you're discharging or destimulating more than you are
restimulating. This gets very important. Because it goes
into this fact now: Why does the tone arm go up and stick?
Why? Is it just the pressure of overrestimulation? Hm-mm.
That's it!

All right. In the presence of no tone arm action, why,
why - if you have no tone arm action - why do you get
restimulation? Well, that gets a bit stickier. Because
you're overwhelming the pc's power of choice and therefore
you're throwing up mass. Restimulation is throwing up mass
on this pc. You're trying to get a discharge and the pc
isn't going to let it discharge and that's what it amounts to.

Now, if you're running something that isn't restimulating
the backtrack heavily, isn't restimulating new stuff
heavily, isn't stepping all over the inert bank and
throwing it into view, and your auditing, therefore - the
type of auditing, would be present life or Prepcheck or 2H
or something like that - is causing an increase in the
height of that tone arm, without a consequent discharge,
you therefore must be overthrowing the pc's power of
choice. And to prove this, he gets more and more ARC
breaky, as this occurs.

Well, somewhere, in that thin, never-never land, of border
between just pure charge - there's no more significance to
it at all, it's the pc is simply overrestimulated, the tone
arm sticks, see? That's an easy one. Some place between
that and then auditing him and not getting any further 
tone arm action, we move over from the simple fact of
overrestimulation, over into this new field, service
facsimile. And we move there, at that point, where, when
we're prepchecking the pc - you won't always notice this,
but it's the third dimensional pole that stuck out of the
two-dimensional plane that indicated this whole thing to me
and permitted it to be wrapped up.

There's the mathematician's story about the two-dimensional
worm. Two-dimensional worm, of course, he lives on a
two-dimensional plane. One day, walking along on this plane
and he bumps into something. And he says, "That shouldn't
be," and looks kind of upset, his reality shattered,
because how can you bump into something if there's only two
dimensions? You can't bump into anything if there's only
two dimensions, because that requires a third dimension.

Another worm comes along, a long time later, he's maybe
heard from this first worm there might be something over
there, and he goes along and he runs into this thing,
clank! And he says, what's that? And he gradually is able
to lift his eyes for a moment off his two-dimensional plane
and he sees this pole up above him. And he says, "Hey!
There's a pole!" And he starts up the pole. And when he
gets up the pole, he doesn't know what the hell to do!
That's where we get our, "Up the pole." That's where it
came from. Somebody went up the pole. He's up there, and he
doesn't know how - the devil it is and he doesn't know where
he is, he sure feels pretty wild and ecstatic sometimes.
He's discovered something, he doesn't know what, has
nothing to do with his reality. And you'll see this
occasionally.

Now, this is a mathematician's - an old time mathematician's
effort to get somebody to understand the fourth dimension.
So he puts it into the second dimension, you see, and then
adds the third dimension and then it gets into everybody's
reality. The actual fact is, anything that has not been
discovered operates sort of in that fashion. You find
something that shouldn't be there.

And the thing that shouldn't be there is that when you are
doing a Prepcheck on somebody who is a stuck or sticky tone
arm case, the Prepcheck will turn on mass, or when you're
doing a Prepcheck on anybody and it turns on mass, you are
looking at something that is perfectly idiotic. How can a
Prepcheck turn on mass? It can't! You're asking somebody
how does - has anything been suppressed? Anything he's been
careful of? Anything he's failed to reveal? Anything been
invalidated? Anything been suggested? Mistake been made?
Anything been protested? Anything he's anxious about,
anything been decided? And you mean to tell me his coming
up with answers to this situation, which are good,
clear-cut answers, are going to turn on mass? How could it
possibly turn on mass? It's not possible!

And that's the basic diagnosis of a service facsimile.
Your Prepcheck buttons would easily get rid of it. But some
other mechanism moves in back of it and asserts it. The pc
is being right as long as he has it and is going to make
somebody else wrong. And the main person who is being made
wrong right there in the session, unfortunately, is you!
And so, there turns on the mass! Pc is perfectly innocent
of this thing.

Let's say - let's take a husband, you see, and we're
prepchecking him and we accidentally start prepchecking him
on his marriage. And we begin to notice there is something
very peculiar starts occurring here with the tone arm. We'd
notice it with the tone arm. The tone arm seems to get less
action. Doesn't seem to be much action in this sphere.
There's a little action, but there's not much. And then all
of a sudden we notice he's looking sort of crushed or strained 
or something. You say, "What's happening?" "Well, something 
seems to be pulling in on me. Something seems to be 
frightening me."

"Well, what happens there? Is - what - what am I asking
about? That makes...?" 

"Well, every time you mention my wife."

Ah, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. What have we got
here? Look, any mass for a thetan, is an assertion, that's
wrong, man! If a thetan's wearing mass, why something's
weird going on, right away, now, anyhow, although you have
to go to some lengths to do something about it. The fact
that it turns on during the Prepcheck shows you rather
quickly the fact that he ain't going to let go of that,
man! You're confronted with this odd phenomena. You got a
block of ice and a hose of hot water. Now, you know and I
know that if you turn a hot water hose on a block of ice,
the block of ice is going to melt and that is going to be
the end of that block of ice, right? Well, you're
confronted with this thing, when mass turns on in a
Prepcheck: You take a hot water hose and you take a block
of ice and the longer you play the hot water hose on the
block of ice, the more ice you've got.

Can't be! That's how you define - there must be interference
with people's livingness on this particular planet. Because
in actual fact, if people just lived long enough, if they
just lived long enough, they would - the restimulation of
life is not really adequate to keeping the whole bank
restimulated. Life isn't that dramatic. Just ordinary
living, it isn't that dramatic. Read all the detective
stories you want to. About the only people that get kicked
around in life - there are a few, there are a few activities
in life which actually manage to furnish themselves enough
restimulation, which on top of the interference with the
thetan on this planet before he's set here and all that
type of implantation and all that sort of stuff, in
addition to that, is almost enough to keep it going.

TBD
Newspaper reporter, he's the leading contender. Every time
there's trouble, every time there is upset, every time
there is anything, the newspaper reporter is there. And
where do we normally find him? We find him at a case level
7. He's only interested in his own opinions. He writes his
story before he leaves the office and comes down to you to
see if there's anything he can furnish - you can furnish him
that will confirm his opinion, which he got before he
arrived and so forth. And you find this young man, he's
ordinarily all shook up, all the time, man, he's in
terrible condition. And you look him over some time. It's
very interesting. They only talk to you if you treat them
like a case level 7. You salt your speech down with, "Your
opinion of this thing is obviously..." and then tell them
what their opinion is and they just sit there... They're -
of course, they're in a hypnotic trance to their own opinion,
so anything you say must be their opinion, see?

Aw, you shouldn't do things like this to people. "Don't
cheer, boys, the poor devils are dying." That sort of an
attitude. It fits in this. There's several other
professions, there's that of doctor, who's always being
pulled around, restimulated and whose suicide rate is
higher than any other. The various activities of this kind
almost furnish enough restimulation, if you start the
person out with that much restimulation.

But, in actual fact, almost any other field, the bank just
would go to sleep, if that was all there was. It'd just go
to sleep! Give it a couple of hundred years, particularly,
or three hundred years, it'd be damping out and things
would be going inert with such rapidity, that the guy would
get a lot better. Of course, this is all potential to be kicked 
in at any moment, so therefore he's in danger to that degree. 
But what do we have? What are we looking at here, when we're
looking at this mass increase? We're looking at an
impossibility. You mean auditing is going to make the guy
worse? You mean mild auditing is going to make the guy
worse? See, what we've asked him in essence, "Now, is there
anything you've decided about your wife?" Well, we know
that that will deintensify mass, don't you see? Naturally,
because it pulls out little fixed attention points and
having pulled those things out, the confusion and randomity
surrounding them tends to ease away, see? Ah, so we pull
out some of these little fixed points and he's got more
mass! Well, that's because what you're doing and what he is
doing are in two different spheres of agreement.

He ain't about to get rid of his attitude and opinions
about his wife and you are trying to get rid of it and the
disagreement in the session is enough to turn on that mass.
His attention - his intention is to hold onto it for
billyo's sake! And your intention is to get rid of it, so
you and the pc are in completely divergent agreement with
regard to this whole situation. He's sitting down there,
not to resolve his marriage. And you start addressing his
marriage, he isn't going to resolve his marriage. He's not
sitting there to resolve his marriage. He's sitting there
to make his wife wrong. That's his only purpose. He has no
other purpose. And don't think for a moment that he does
have! No matter what he says, he's just trying to make
somebody wrong. Now, it follows that any thetan that has
been hit hard and consistently and continuously, has had
loses continuously and who has tried to get back at and
attack continuously any zone or sphere, will be unable to
put in the itsa line on what is attacking him.

He can't say what it is. And that's actually all there is
to this whole mechanism I'm talking to you about. Can't put
in the itsa line. He can't say whether it's bad, he can't
say whether it's good, he can't recognize it or something
like that. Maybe it was emanating too much. He doesn't feel
he has the power to look back along that communication line
or be at cause over that communication line, in any way.

Now, a thetan, to be sane at all and to have any reality at
all, has got to be at - some degree at cause. Now when he
goes down scale his final method of staying at cause - this
is present all the way down scale, but remember it's only
when it becomes a final method that it becomes horrible - is
to be right. And for the other person, to be wrong. And
this goes on down the line to a point where he simply has
to - to make them wrong - he simply has to hold the concept
that they are wrong. And to be right, he simply has to realize
that he is right. And the final effort of being right and 
wrong on the thing is just to have the idea or concept that 
one is right and the concept that the other person is wrong. 
And he is still being cause.

His target is a thousand light-years away and has been dead
for trillennia. Don't you see? He wouldn't even know when
it disappeared. That's one of the laughable points of it
is. He wouldn't even know if he'd ever succeeded. Because
he can't observe it. It isn't there to observe. So this
particular mechanism hangs out in life as a sort of a side
panel to it all, because it can never as-is. He never knows
when they disappear. He never knows when they go away.

You could take some old lady and haunt her house for days
and days and weeks and months, and so forth, and then not
haunt her house. And she's liable to go on for years, being
sure the house is being haunted. You understand? You - you
get how this mechanism comes in?

Well, it's because she never saw anything that was haunting
the house. And she couldn't have gotten back at it in the
first place, so there is no method of inspection of
cessation. How do you inspect the end of everything? How
does it end? How do we know it ends? Do you know there are
Japanese soldiers left out in the Pacific, who still think
that World War II is in progress. I'm absolutely sure of
it. Because they were finding them years after World War
II, up in caves and so forth, on South Pacific Islands and
they just knew what would happen to them if they were ever
captured and that sort of thing and the war had been over
for ages! And there they were, up in the woods.

They were haunted by a nonexistent thing, in other words.
Why were they? Well, because they didn't have the
communication line to ascertain a cessation. They couldn't
ascertain that it had ended. So if they couldn't find out
if it had ended, the right survival action is to assume
that it is continuing. So, one answers the problem of
survival best, in that particular category. There's many a
guy who has been missing the top of his head. Many a guy -
top of his head went missing, because he assumed that the 
enemy over in the next gully had pulled out. So he looks. 
And there went the top of his head, you see?

Now, life can teach you this lesson - rather consistently
and continually. So eventually, you develop a little more
cautious frame of mind with regard to these things, you
eventually come up with this solution to those problems.
That if you cannot ascertain if anything is ended, you then
assume it is continuing. And out of this you get this
wrongness-rightness thing going on for trillennia.

In the first place, the guy went back into - through force
and overts and other things - he went back into only being
able to be right about this thing. He couldn't do anything
about it, you know. If you want to really start a
cacophony, ask somebody in one of these modern socialistic
countries, how they have been right about the government.
You're liable to get automaticities. But you say, these
people don't ever think about the government. I know they
don't ever think about the government. No, they don't do
anything to the government, no, they don't have anything to
do with the government. They're supposed to vote once in a
while, but less and less votes are being cast per capita.
That's the final thing they could be about the government,
is right. That's the final thing they could be about the
government.

Look at the fantastic things they would have to do, in
order to have the government be wrong. Look, look at them,
man! They're legion! And they'd all be aberrated. Why?
Since the government today represents fantastic force!
Fantastic quantities of force are represented in the powers
of government. So much so that the leading heads of
government today tell you that no population can revolt.
US - top gun in the US not very long ago was holding forth
at great rate on the subject. I think it was Lodge, Henry
Cabot Lodge, and he was holding forth at a great rate on
how no modern population could revolt in the face of the
weapons which were available today in the hands of the 
government.

What is he talking about? He's talking about raw force,
isn't he? The more that force goes upstairs and the
more - and less and less able that populace is, to ever
reach back, in any way at the government or to be cause
over that government, you see, the less, so forth, why, 
the more they have to go into aberrated rightness and
wrongnesses with regard to the government. Until they
finally get down to some of the wildest things you ever
heard of!

And you'll find people walking down the street, and they
spit, on the street. And that's their one channel of action
against the government. Because it's against the law. How
could they be right about the government? They could spit.
It's irrational, see? It - listened to in that line, it
becomes totally incomprehensible to the auditor. How this
could, any way, shape or form, add up to a logical answer
of rightness and wrongness. And that is why it is aberrated
and that is why it turns on mass and that is why a
Prepcheck won't do anything with it. Because it's totally
irrational.

Now, how do you establish this? Well, actually you could
establish it with the preliminary step of R3R. You could
establish what they're being right about; what they're
being wrong about. You could take your original listing
steps of R2  - R2-12. Don't do R2-12 on pcs, by the way,
it's dangerous. But you could take the original listing
steps of R2. You can think of innumerable ways to establish
this sort of thing. You can say, "What have you been trying
to solve in processing?" This is another totally illogical
approach. "What have you been trying to resolve in your
case in processing, Mr. Smith? Very good. Oh, you've been
trying to resolve the fact that you have ringing in your
ears? Thank you very much, Mr. Smith. Now, let's see, how
many hours of processing have you had ringing in the ears?"

"Well, let's see, I had a twenty-five hour intensive in
Washington, I had fifty hours in London. Then there was a
private field auditor who gave me a hundred and
seventy-five hours, and that didn't do any good either,
heh, heh, no, that didn't do any good. And then we had
numerous other processing and there was a lot of Group
Processing and that sort of thing and I tried some 'Subub'
too and that didn't do any good either, and so forth. And
I've been under a doctor's care for some time now, with
this ear ringing, and so forth, and just nothing does it
any good."

He has given you the whole song, bell, book and candle, so
help me! He's told you that the ringing in his ears is, or
is associated with, a service facsimile. What is the
rationale? It is a service facsimile because it didn't
surrender to processing. Didn't surrender to mild
processing, so it must be a service facsimile. I mean,
the - you will be lead astray, in two directions; assuming
that everything is a service facsimile and trying to run
everything on rightness and wrongness and the other way is
just assume that nothing is, because it is all so
reasonable. Well, he's got it all explained. Actually the
first auditor he had over in Washington was mean to him.
And the next half a dozen auditors he had, they didn't
understand him. That was obvious. And we didn't have the
technology at that particular time.

You see, you can be logical about this whole thing, you can
go on and on and on. You can realize all of this. You can
figure it all out. But all I ask you to do, is just look,
head on, at that one fact: Has the guy been processed on it
unsuccessfully? Or is it something he wanted to resolve in
processing and never seemed to be able to resolve? And that
is your total diagnosis of a service facsimile, from an
auditing point of view.

Now, you can diagnose it in numerous other ways. You can
use the medicos for a diagnosis. You say, "What have the
medicos treated you for, bud?" "Uhh, kidneys - kidney
trouble, ne-ho-ho. Didn't make me any better, they operated
and then they put in two new kidneys and then we have a
couple inflatable life tubes now, back there, and so
forth..." You can use this, don't you see? Now, you have to
vary the wording of it, so that it makes sense, like - what
is it, his health, sometimes it takes a broader word than
"kidneys," you see, "being sick," "being unable," and so
forth. One of the ways of doing this would - "What would be
a method of making others wrong?" and he will sometimes
give you on a list of what would be a method of making
others wrong, he will sometimes give you the exact thing
that he is making others wrong about and you turn the
process around and find out how he is being right with it.
Which is the missing side of it, don't you see.

Now, I'm not pretending that - to give you at this
particular moment a complete diagnostic system by which you
could always determine the service facsimile. This includes
other things such as the hidden standard and other things
of that character. I'm not trying to give you such a system
at this moment. I'm simply pointing out to you the basic
mechanics which underlie this thing.

The O/W sequence falls hand in glove with this, because of
course, as I will tell you in another lecture, make-guilty
is something we've known about for a very long time and
which plays its role in this. But your right-wrong
characteristics and factors involved on it are very useful
and very usable.

These are survival mechanisms, whether they realize it or
not. And, if you can just look at them as survival
mechanisms, and not expect them to be sensible survival
mechanisms, why you can crack almost any case. If you go
around insisting that every survival mechanism be sensible,
or workable, then you're not going to crack a lot of cases.
And you're going to find that there's some weird ones
sitting around and they sit around on these buttons of
rightness and wrongness. Fortunately, there are only these
buttons that would really aberrate a human being, then.

There would be survival, domination, rightness and
wrongness. And, if those buttons were not contaminated in
any way, why life would be a dream for an auditor. But he,
of course, has got to run - some broken field running in
here, against the backtrack implants that contain the words
"right" and "wrong." And he's got some other things to
worry about - he could use time to get around these things.
He's got other mechanisms to use to get around these
things. But it's still a liability processing very directly
on the thing.

So, at the moment I would reserve rightness and wrongness
for the extreme case that doesn't immediately surrender and
go down toward fast tone arm action and good tone arm
action on Prepcheck, and destimulate rapidly, then I would
get very interested in what part of their case, or
maintaining themselves in an aberrated condition, is a
service facsimile and resolve that and get back to standard
processing.

We're not trying to ride a hobby horse here, whereby all
processing becomes the service facsimile, you see that
often - too often happens. What we are doing is simply
giving you a weapon, whereby if a case gets difficult on
you and you're doing all of the usual things for the case,
and so forth, and yet the tone arm does not come down and
level out, then you had better go into an examination of
this case from the viewpoint of a service facsimile, and
you will find out, and the case will agree, that there are
several reasons why he must not get well!

And when you crack through that, of course, your technology
goes through it like hot butter and you get the remaining
thirty or forty percent that you were looking for. Okay?

Thank you very much!

[End of tape.]



